<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>420LawOffice.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://420lawoffice.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://420lawoffice.com</link>
	<description>888-420-LAW1  / 430 S Fuller Av #9-J / Los Angeles, CA 90036</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Good News:  The Inland Empire and Pack Decisions are not effective&#8230;at least for the moment!</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/good-news-the-inland-empire-and-pack-decisions-are-not-effective-at-least-for-the-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/good-news-the-inland-empire-and-pack-decisions-are-not-effective-at-least-for-the-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[420lawoffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Medical Marijuana Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inland empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pack case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victory for medical marijuana patients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court has granted Certiori as to the Pack and Inland Empire cases both of which were negative holdings for the patients of California. The former effects of the cases were to permit cities to ban storefront dispensaries (Inland Empire) and to prevent cities from affirmative regulation of the industry (Pack). Time will [...]<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/good-news-the-inland-empire-and-pack-decisions-are-not-effective-at-least-for-the-moment/">Good News:  The Inland Empire and Pack Decisions are not effective&#8230;at least for the moment!</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Supreme Court has granted Certiori as to the Pack and Inland Empire cases both of which were negative holdings for the patients of California.  The former effects of the cases were to permit cities to ban storefront dispensaries (Inland Empire) and to prevent cities from affirmative regulation of the industry (Pack).</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/MQeqnmQNzBk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Time will tell whether the Supreme Court will move the pendulum towards further patients rights or not&#8230;but indications are good&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/good-news-the-inland-empire-and-pack-decisions-are-not-effective-at-least-for-the-moment/">Good News:  The Inland Empire and Pack Decisions are not effective&#8230;at least for the moment!</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/good-news-the-inland-empire-and-pack-decisions-are-not-effective-at-least-for-the-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Medical Marijuana Conspiracy:  Interview of Stewart Richlin by Prof. James Fetzer</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/the-medical-marijuana-conspiracy-interview-of-stewart-richlin-by-prof-james-fetzer/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/the-medical-marijuana-conspiracy-interview-of-stewart-richlin-by-prof-james-fetzer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[420lawoffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Medical Marijuana Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Police Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This segment of our 420lawoffice radio show has a new introduction, plus the complete 5/11 interview with the history present and future of the great medical marijuana conspiracy.  Must know information&#8230;.. &#160; The Medical Marijuana Conspiracy: Interview of Stewart Richlin by Prof. James Fetzer is a post from: 420LawOffice.com<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/the-medical-marijuana-conspiracy-interview-of-stewart-richlin-by-prof-james-fetzer/">The Medical Marijuana Conspiracy:  Interview of Stewart Richlin by Prof. James Fetzer</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This segment of our 420lawoffice radio show has a new introduction, plus the complete 5/11 interview with the history present and future of the great medical marijuana conspiracy.  Must know information&#8230;..</p>
<p>&nbsp; <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6dsDXG_Eh7w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/the-medical-marijuana-conspiracy-interview-of-stewart-richlin-by-prof-james-fetzer/">The Medical Marijuana Conspiracy:  Interview of Stewart Richlin by Prof. James Fetzer</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/the-medical-marijuana-conspiracy-interview-of-stewart-richlin-by-prof-james-fetzer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>URGENT: DEADLINE FOR filing tax registration certificate in Los Angles</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/urgent-deadline-for-filing-tax-registration-certificate-in-los-angles/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/urgent-deadline-for-filing-tax-registration-certificate-in-los-angles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But&#8230;&#8230;should you or not, does this apply to you or not?  That is a question that requires unique analysis for you and your collective, your CPA and your licensed California lawyer.  Ultimately the decision will be yours but you will be armed with vital information to help you make that decision. URGENT: DEADLINE FOR filing [...]<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/urgent-deadline-for-filing-tax-registration-certificate-in-los-angles/">URGENT: DEADLINE FOR filing tax registration certificate in Los Angles</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;&#8230;should you or not, does this apply to you or not?  That is a question that requires unique analysis for you and your collective, your CPA and your licensed California lawyer.  Ultimately the decision will be yours but you will be armed with vital information to help you make that decision.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9Sca7bTEgP4" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/urgent-deadline-for-filing-tax-registration-certificate-in-los-angles/">URGENT: DEADLINE FOR filing tax registration certificate in Los Angles</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/urgent-deadline-for-filing-tax-registration-certificate-in-los-angles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some much needed Good News for Medical Marijuana Patients from Kamala Harris, and from the California Medical Association</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/some-much-needed-good-news-for-medical-marijuana-patients-from-kamala-harris-and-from-the-california-medical-association/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/some-much-needed-good-news-for-medical-marijuana-patients-from-kamala-harris-and-from-the-california-medical-association/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week saw some much needed good news for patients&#8217; rights. Kamala Harris, California Attorney General spoke out in favor of safe access and against a sweeping federal crackdown. And the California Medical Association joined the American Medical Association in supporting medical marijuana. The world is watching&#8230;&#8230; Some much needed Good News for Medical Marijuana [...]<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/some-much-needed-good-news-for-medical-marijuana-patients-from-kamala-harris-and-from-the-california-medical-association/">Some much needed Good News for Medical Marijuana Patients from Kamala Harris, and from the California Medical Association</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week saw some much needed good news for patients&#8217; rights. Kamala Harris, California Attorney General spoke out in favor of safe access and against a sweeping federal crackdown.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/iYuunKKey_Y" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p>
<p>And the California Medical Association joined the American Medical Association in supporting medical marijuana.</p>
<p>The world is watching&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/some-much-needed-good-news-for-medical-marijuana-patients-from-kamala-harris-and-from-the-california-medical-association/">Some much needed Good News for Medical Marijuana Patients from Kamala Harris, and from the California Medical Association</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/some-much-needed-good-news-for-medical-marijuana-patients-from-kamala-harris-and-from-the-california-medical-association/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Legal Issues for Patients and Landlords</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/some-legal-issues-for-patients-and-landlords/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/some-legal-issues-for-patients-and-landlords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To mark week 3 of the new federal crackdown, in this installment Mr. Richlin analyses a simple hypothetical so show some of the complexities in medical marijuana law. &#160; &#160; Some Legal Issues for Patients and Landlords is a post from: 420LawOffice.com<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/some-legal-issues-for-patients-and-landlords/">Some Legal Issues for Patients and Landlords</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To mark week 3 of the new federal crackdown, in this installment Mr. Richlin analyses a simple hypothetical so show some of the complexities in medical marijuana law.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nD4t7rrOxTw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/some-legal-issues-for-patients-and-landlords/">Some Legal Issues for Patients and Landlords</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/some-legal-issues-for-patients-and-landlords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Crackdown on Medical Marijuana, Radio Show</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/federal-crackdown-on-medical-marijuana-radio-show/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/federal-crackdown-on-medical-marijuana-radio-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[420 law office radio show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[420lawoffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Medical Marijuana Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal crackdown on medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the &#8220;NEW FEDERAL CRACKDOWN ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA?&#8221; It is definitely the question of the day, on the lips of patients, landlords, collective managers and city councils. The inherent conflict of law that has always salted the medical marijuana issue has finally boiled over. Patients don&#8217;t know whether they should continue in collectives. But, [...]<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/federal-crackdown-on-medical-marijuana-radio-show/">Federal Crackdown on Medical Marijuana, Radio Show</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the &#8220;NEW FEDERAL CRACKDOWN ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA?&#8221; It is definitely the question of the day, on the lips of patients, landlords, collective managers and city councils.</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/uSqQVn4Q8Io" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>The inherent conflict of law that has always salted the medical marijuana issue has finally boiled over. Patients don&#8217;t know whether they should continue in collectives. But, why now?  Why are we seeing a federal crackdown on medical cannabis in the states that permit it under their laws.  Many legitimate patients, particularly those who can&#8217;t grow their own for various reasons, will wind up going to the black or grey market to get their cannabis. This is the law of unintended consequences.</p>
<p>In this same week we saw the Rand Corp. study recanted under Lysenko-style political pressure.  Hopefully Rand will not be bullied, but will do a full blown study and truly help stop this unfairness, dishonesty, duplicity and lack of compassion. </p>
<p>Did anyone in government read the 9th and 10th amendments of the constitution?  Listen to Michael Badnarik interviewed on Alex Jones, and consider whether the federal government&#8217;s crackdown on medical marijuana is legal under the constitution, the supreme law of the land.</p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/federal-crackdown-on-medical-marijuana-radio-show/">Federal Crackdown on Medical Marijuana, Radio Show</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/federal-crackdown-on-medical-marijuana-radio-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Federal Policy for Medical Marijuana, DEA Press Conference</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/new-federal-policy-for-medical-marijuana-dea-press-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/new-federal-policy-for-medical-marijuana-dea-press-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[420lawoffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Medical Marijuana Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new federal policy on medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stewart richlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cole memorandum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government is making it clear: it reserves the right to enforce the Controlled Substances Act against medical marijuana uses in California in particular if they are near schools and sensitive uses with children, and if they permit on site consumption of medical marijuana. Obviously this is a shade different than the original campaign [...]<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/new-federal-policy-for-medical-marijuana-dea-press-conference/">New Federal Policy for Medical Marijuana, DEA Press Conference</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government is making it clear: it reserves the right to enforce the Controlled Substances Act against medical marijuana uses in California in particular if they are near schools and sensitive uses with children, and if they permit on site consumption of medical marijuana.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/slkDOEZiG5g" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p>
<p>Obviously this is a shade different than the original campaign and early presidential announcements of the Obama administration. Ironically, Ron Paul, a medical doctor and multi term congressman, and presidential candidate totally differs on the risks inherent in driving under the influence of marijuana&#8230;</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yVw-CwA929c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/new-federal-policy-for-medical-marijuana-dea-press-conference/">New Federal Policy for Medical Marijuana, DEA Press Conference</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/new-federal-policy-for-medical-marijuana-dea-press-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor Brown: Please Don&#8217;t Sign AB 1300 and SB 847</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/ab-1300/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/ab-1300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[420lawoffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab 1300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Medical Marijuana Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sb 847]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stewart richlin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open letter to Governor Brown (if you feel the same, contact him, below) 1. SB 847 will make patients collectives that are established but within 600 feet of a residence, have to close.  This ignores their pre-existing rights, stigmatizes patients, and reduces safe access. 2. AB 1300 will allow cities to ban dispensaries.  This will [...]<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/ab-1300/">Governor Brown: Please Don&#8217;t Sign AB 1300 and SB 847</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open letter to Governor Brown (if you feel the same, contact him, below)</p>
<p>1. SB 847 will make patients collectives that are established but within 600 feet of a residence, have to close.  This ignores their pre-existing rights, stigmatizes patients, and reduces safe access.</p>
<p>2. AB 1300 will allow cities to ban dispensaries.  This will make a patchwork of city rules, and it will lead to &#8220;small town thinking&#8221; and local rule of an item of state-wide concern that should be governed by state law, not small minds and their belief systems about medical marijuana.</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="345" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JOOAgfHx9tk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Both of these lousy measures were written by DEMOCRATS (shame, shame) and both passed both houses of the state legislature.  There is only one last ditch chance, the veto and the pocket veto.<br />
Get involved, let&#8217;s send the message to the Gov: don&#8217;t sign these bills which clearly derogate from State rights!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a title="democracy in action" href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/182/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=7656" target="_blank">Here is a place to contact Governor Brown</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/ab-1300/">Governor Brown: Please Don&#8217;t Sign AB 1300 and SB 847</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/ab-1300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you should NEVER speak with the police even if you are innocent!!!!</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/why-you-should-never-speak-with-the-police-even-if-your-are-innocent/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/why-you-should-never-speak-with-the-police-even-if-your-are-innocent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[420lawoffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Medical Marijuana Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stewart richlin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why you should never speak with police?  Because even the innocent can be ensnared in prosecution&#8230;Enjoy this terrific lecture on the fifth amendment to the constitution of the United States! &#160; A law school professor and former criminal defense attorney tells you why you should never agree to be interviewed by the police.  Never!  Watch [...]<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/why-you-should-never-speak-with-the-police-even-if-your-are-innocent/">Why you should NEVER speak with the police even if you are innocent!!!!</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why you should never speak with police?  Because even the innocent can be ensnared in prosecution&#8230;Enjoy this terrific lecture on the fifth amendment to the constitution of the United States!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6wXkI4t7nuc" frameborder="0" width="425" height="349"></iframe></p>
<div id="watch-description-text">
<p id="eow-description">A law school professor and former criminal defense attorney tells you why you should never agree to be interviewed by the police.  Never!  Watch the whole presentation, and learn&#8230;</p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/why-you-should-never-speak-with-the-police-even-if-your-are-innocent/">Why you should NEVER speak with the police even if you are innocent!!!!</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/why-you-should-never-speak-with-the-police-even-if-your-are-innocent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Cole Memorandum &#8220;Bless&#8221; the Caregiver Defense?</title>
		<link>http://420lawoffice.com/does-the-cole-memorandum-bless-the-caregiver-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://420lawoffice.com/does-the-cole-memorandum-bless-the-caregiver-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[420lawoffice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Medical Marijuana Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caregiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new federal policy on medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stewart richlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cole memorandum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://420lawoffice.com/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the new Cole Memorandum on medical marijuana federal law enforcement continues to sink in, it is notable that it specifically refers to the &#8220;caregiver&#8221; defense. California law has permitted the caregiver defense since 1996, however, in the 2005 Mensch case, the California Supreme Court found that to properly raise the caregiver defense, the caregiver [...]<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/does-the-cole-memorandum-bless-the-caregiver-defense/">Does the Cole Memorandum &#8220;Bless&#8221; the Caregiver Defense?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the new Cole Memorandum on medical marijuana federal law enforcement continues to sink in, it is notable that it specifically refers to the &#8220;caregiver&#8221; defense.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aEqG3lZjVls" frameborder="0" width="425" height="349"></iframe></p>
<p>California law has permitted the caregiver defense since 1996, however, in the 2005 <em>Mensch</em> case, the California Supreme Court found that to properly raise the caregiver defense, the caregiver must have had an ongoing prior relationship with the patient in which the caregiver provides for the patient&#8217;s health, safety and/or housing.  Merely reciting the word &#8220;caregiver&#8221; is of no legal effect, what is significant is the actual legal relationship of the patient and caregiver.</p>
<p>Since the Cole Memo specifically states that the caregiver defense will, along with the actions of sick patients, qualify for &#8220;lowest priority&#8221; in terms of the federal government&#8217;s enforcement expenditures of time and money, you could say that since the Cole Memorandum, the Caregiver Defense&#8217;s stock has gone up!</p>
<p>Stewart Richlin, Esq. is a California lawyer with over 25 years of experience in civil law.  Having represented thousands of patients and hundreds of collectives, Mr. Richlin has been court-qualified as an expert in the field.  Mr. Richlin&#8217;s &#8220;MEDICAL MARIJUANA COLLEGE&#8221; is a one on one legal conference in his Hollywood office which includes a detailed analysis of FEDERAL, STATE, and LOCAL law on the topic; it includes a copy of his book on 420 law, the latest edition of which is just off the presses, and contains about 125 pages of materials to facilitate your mastery of the legal issues raised by medical marijuana rights in the State of California.  Call us at 888-420-LAW-1   or locally at 323-540-4<strong>420.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://420lawoffice.com/does-the-cole-memorandum-bless-the-caregiver-defense/">Does the Cole Memorandum &#8220;Bless&#8221; the Caregiver Defense?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://420lawoffice.com">420LawOffice.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://420lawoffice.com/does-the-cole-memorandum-bless-the-caregiver-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

